Continue reading »]]>

I serve as a resource for the digital humanities center in my library and have been asked to facilitate a brown bag discussion on accessibility and the digital humanities. I’m also a member of a THATCamp organizing committee and am thinking of ways to approach accessibility-related topics if we offer workshops in addition to sessions proposed on the spot. As I’ve started putting together ideas, it has occurred to me that others might also have a need for essential information on DH and accessibility.

This session might be a discussion or the beginning of a product: a pitch, a 7 Things You Should Know About-type publication, a blog post, a compilation of existing resources, a lesson plan for workshops to be offered in our own organizations and classrooms or at other THATCamps, etc..

Would others interested in teaching and training like to talk about strategies for broadening colleagues/students understanding of disability, universal design, and accessible DH?

Note: This discussion might best be facilitated by another attendee. I’m attending virtually and, while I serve as a resource for the digital humanities center in my library, I’m not a digital humanist/digital humanities practitioner, so others probably have a better understanding of existing resources and the needs of the community.

Continue reading »]]>

I’m interested in talking about accessible tools for DH work: how to use digital tools more accessibly and exploring more accessible alternatives.

If anyone else is interested in exploring this during THATCamp Accessibility, I’m thinking we could go about it in a number of different ways. For example, we could talk informally and make notes, or, if we want to make it more of a working session, we could create a resource for accessible DH work.

If we go the “make something” route, perhaps we could create a list of (ten?) frequently-used tools and compile information about their accessibility along with suggestions on how to use them in a more accessible manner and/or more accessible alternatives. Or, we could identify a set of DH-related needs/tasks (data visualization, dynamic mapping, etc.) and brainstorm accessible tools and methods for meeting these needs/accomplishing these tasks. We could generate our own lists of tools and tasks or draw on an existing resource like Bamboo DiRT or the Research + Tools section of the CHNM website.

A couple of caveats: This discussion might best be facilitated by another attendee. I’m attending virtually and, while I serve as a resource for the digital humanities center in my library, I’m not a digital humanist/digital humanities practitioner, so others probably have a better understanding of existing resources and the needs of the community.

Continue reading »]]>

My post is written in dialogue with Peter Holdsworth’s latest post, which I read as being focused on the methodological questions around the increasing accessibility of data for the historian. I hope that some of us might wish also to discuss what specific practical tools allow us to deal with the avalanche of material that is now at our fingertips. Primary sources are increasingly accessible online (both as image and text files). Googlebooks, scholarly databases (e.g. Project Muse, Persée) or National Libraries (e.g. Bibliothèque Nationale de France) multiply the secondary literature now searchable by a few keystrokes. But how to make sense of the thousands of hits that Googlebooks offers us, even after we discount the many false positives? How do we keep track of so much information? How do we avoid reduplicating our effort when rechecking databases that keep expanding significantly every six months? How do we display this information to readers? While text (articles, books) remains the endpoint of scholarly production, are there other ways that we can present our evidence and allow our datasets to be used by others? Most importantly, however, for this proposed discussion, is what are the tools available now to historians, to pursue this kind of work.

My interest in these questions arise from my work establishing a scholarly edition of a twelfth-century chronicle which –despite relative obscurity– has nonetheless garnered limited but sustained interest for several centuries. While it is relatively straight forward to keep track of where and when scholars wrote about the chronicle using bibliographic software like Endnote (and establishing who cited who, by using a bit more brainpower), the task becomes much more difficult when trying to account for other factors. To judge whether a stupendously inaccurate seventeenth-century scholar actually saw a copy of the chronicle, necessitates plotting the locations over time of the fourteen now extant manuscripts as well as the nine centuries of movements by scholars themselves. What digital tools, I ask, allow scholars to keep track and arrange this sort of information (temporally, spatially)? And  what tools exist to make sense of the information, so that it has something relevant to say to historians? And after conclusions are reached, what tools can we used to display this web of information to an audience?