Oct
19

One Week Till THATCamp!

Hi everyone!

We’ve got a great group of campers signed up for THATCamp Accessibility. Some session proposals are starting to come in – if you’ve got an idea of what it is you’d like to talk about or explore, please post it, no matter how nebulous! I’m hoping that there will be a session on getting started with Accessibility and Digital Technology. As one of your hosts, it has been an enormous learning curve for me personally to consider all of the various issues that come with trying to make an event fully accessible. Already, I realize just how un-accessible much of my teaching has been. Do I make pdfs that are readable by screen readers? Why don’t I record my lectures? The READ Institute has been developing a crowd-sourcing approach to screen-captioning that I hope to see demonstrated on Saturday the 27th too.

Tomorrow evening, we’ll close the registration for physical attendance of THATCamp – we have badges to make, rooms to set up, food to order, webcams and microphones to test. If you can’t make it to Carleton on the day, don’t despair! On Monday, I’ll be posting instructions on how to use our fully accessible conferencing system (provided for us courtesy of Citizens with Disabilities Ontario, to whom we are enormously grateful).  On Saturday, if you follow the instructions, you can beam into one of our four ‘rooms’ to follow along, participate, and contribute to THATCamp!

What’s the difference between an ‘accessible’ conference system and say, a combination of a Google+ hangout or live blogging/tweeting etc (as THATCamp Hybrid Pedagogy is trying out)? Our system is designed to work with screen readers etc – it allows for real-time sharing of documents within that kind of environment. It will also keep an audio recording of each session (from which we hope to extract a transcript using our crowdsourcing platform, eventually). On Saturday morning, we’ll try to develop our schedule with contributions both from people on the floor and in the aether. Will it work? Well, whether it does or not, we’ll certainly learn an awful lot about how to design and run these sorts of blended events, opening up participation well beyond our walls.

Won’t you join us?

Shawn

 

Oct
15

Digital Tools: Making Sense of Digital Archives

My post is written in dialogue with Peter Holdsworth’s latest post, which I read as being focused on the methodological questions around the increasing accessibility of data for the historian. I hope that some of us might wish also to discuss what specific practical tools allow us to deal with the avalanche of material that is now at our fingertips. Primary sources are increasingly accessible online (both as image and text files). Googlebooks, scholarly databases (e.g. Project Muse, Persée) or National Libraries (e.g. Bibliothèque Nationale de France) multiply the secondary literature now searchable by a few keystrokes. But how to make sense of the thousands of hits that Googlebooks offers us, even after we discount the many false positives? How do we keep track of so much information? How do we avoid reduplicating our effort when rechecking databases that keep expanding significantly every six months? How do we display this information to readers? While text (articles, books) remains the endpoint of scholarly production, are there other ways that we can present our evidence and allow our datasets to be used by others? Most importantly, however, for this proposed discussion, is what are the tools available now to historians, to pursue this kind of work.

My interest in these questions arise from my work establishing a scholarly edition of a twelfth-century chronicle which –despite relative obscurity– has nonetheless garnered limited but sustained interest for several centuries. While it is relatively straight forward to keep track of where and when scholars wrote about the chronicle using bibliographic software like Endnote (and establishing who cited who, by using a bit more brainpower), the task becomes much more difficult when trying to account for other factors. To judge whether a stupendously inaccurate seventeenth-century scholar actually saw a copy of the chronicle, necessitates plotting the locations over time of the fourteen now extant manuscripts as well as the nine centuries of movements by scholars themselves. What digital tools, I ask, allow scholars to keep track and arrange this sort of information (temporally, spatially)? And  what tools exist to make sense of the information, so that it has something relevant to say to historians? And after conclusions are reached, what tools can we used to display this web of information to an audience?

Oct
14

Digital Archives: Implications for Accessibility and Methodology

Hi everyone,

I would be interested in exploring how the recent digitization of traditional archival sources can be used to help expand methodologies in multiple fields.  Increasingly, organizations including national archives, the Internet Archive, Google, and more local groups, such as the Niagara Historical Society, are involved in this digitization process.  Many documents previously confined to the physical archive are now more readily accessible to scholars, although there can be issues of intellectual property rights, particularly in relationship to Google’s involvement. How can this contribute to scholarship and what does it imply for methods in history and other fields. Does this increased digital accessibility allow scholars of the humanities and social sciences to find new directions and angles by using digital tools and methodologies (e.g. text mining and social network theory) and does it also encourage them to use sources from other fields? Can this lead to a blurring of the divide between the social sciences and the humanities in a way that the analysis and conclusions still stand up to the assumptions of knowledge and standards of the respective fields?  This is of particular interest to me as my M.A. work on the commemoration of the War of 1812 deals with such questions.  More broadly, it also has the potential to help multiple fields interrogate previously held conclusions from their disciplines.

Creative Commons License
This work by Peter W Holdsworth is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Oct
04

Session Proposal: Accessibility & unintended consequences of IP law

Hi everyone,

I wonder if there is a discussion to be had concerning intellectual property law and accessibility. The thought is prompted by a tweet I saw last night, concerning this article: “Guy Creates Open Source Free Font for Dyslexic Readers; Gets Copyright Cease and Desist Threat”. (More information about the font may be obtained here.) I suppose the issue is that there is a tension between trying to profit from providing services and digital items that meet accessibility needs, and broader movements in open access and creative commons type modifications and adaptations. I have no grounding in legal issues whatsoever, but perhaps there might be folks wishing to explore this terrain? What guidelines exist to help creators avoid falling into legal IP trouble?

 

Oct
04

Promotional Poster for THATCamp Accessibility

Tom Pokinko has designed a fully accessible pdf poster promoting THATCamp Accessibility. Most pdfs that you might come across are filled with hidden elements that can trip up a screen reader device. Tom took our promotional materials, and redesigned everything so that they can be read by a screen reader without let or hinderance! Thank you Tom!

THAT Camp Accessibility Poster Accessible PDF

THAT Camp Poster for Print

THAT Camp Poster for Print

Oct
03

Promoting an unconference on the radio

I was interviewed by the Live 88.5 Startup radio morning show last week; it aired yesterday morning. Here’s the clip. Enjoy!

October 2 Unconference

Sep
20

Major new project on Accessibility and the Digital Humanities: BrailleSC

Logo for the BrailleSC project

Logo for the BrailleSC project

Profhacker today has an excellent post on accessibility issues and the digital humanities. It is an excellent post and worth a read by all who are interested in the intersection of DH and accessibility. I’m very intrigued, also, by the new project they announce, which is in partnership with WordPress

For the 2012-2013 academic year, the BrailleSC project and the Maryland Institute for Technology in the Humanities have partnered to extend WordPress–a system recommended frequently here at ProfHacker–to the blind and low-vision communities by creating a plug-in that will allow anyone to translate WordPress content to braille text. We’ve titled our efforts “Making the Digital Humanities More Open.”

Given the importance of WordPress as a platform for all kinds of projects, this is extremely exciting. At the BrailleSC project page, there’s a bit more information, explaining how the system will be built on the Anthologize plugin for WordPress. Anthologize has its genesis in One Week|One Tool, a very THATCamp-ish experiment.

Sep
18

Announcing a New Partner: Citizens With Disabilities – Ontario

Citizens With Disabilities Ontario Logo

Citizens With Disabilities Ontario Logo

We are pleased to announce that we are partnering with Citizens With Disabilites – Ontario to provide the accessible online conferencing system on October 27th. CWDO “actively promotes the rights, freedoms and responsibilities of persons with disabilities through community development, social action, and member support and referral.  [Their] primary activity is public education and awareness about the social and physical barriers that prevent the full inclusion of persons with disabilities in Ontario.”

We are enormously grateful to CWDO for making their system available. The ‘IDEAL Conference‘ system “provides the most accessible conferencing and collaboration experience available, anywhere in the world.  No new hardware is needed. All you need is a PC with a soundcard, headset, and a high-speed connection to the Internet; and you can hold fully accessible, 508 compliant online conferences from your desktop, from anywhere in the world, right now!”

Details about how to access the system will be provided to those who have indicated in their registration that they wish to attend online, closer to the date.

Sep
18

Registration Period Open Until October 20th

In the interests of making this event as accessible as possible, and to give everyone who wants to the chance to participate, we’re going to keep the registration open until one week before the day. The registration period is open until the 20th, and we hope to have you with us on the 27th!

Sep
16

osmand accessibility plugins

It’s an Android app that uses OpenStreetmap format data. So basically an off line electronic map with routing etc.

In theory it can use accessibility plug ins.

Is any one aware of such a plug in?

Thanks John

Update 2012/9/17
Apparently a blind person has written a plug in for the blind and is using it but no documentation is available at the moment.

Cheerio John

Older posts «

» Newer posts

Skip to toolbar